2014 Writing Group Stats

OK, I can’t help it. My computer science background means that I’m a numbers guy. On top of that, I’ve always been taught that you can only improve what you can measure. In 2014, I tracked my attendance at my two writing groups, as well as my submission percentage, i.e. – how often I submitted content to the groups to be critiqued.

Here are my statistics:

Writing Group First Meeting Attended Submissions Sub % Stories
Loudoun County Writers Group 3/24/14 36 15 42% 5
Loudoun SF Critique Group 6/8/14 26  8 31% 3
    62 23 37% 8

So let’s break this down a bit. I attended 62 meetings. Each meeting is two hours. In addition, there are sometimes post-meeting discussions or lunches that are just as valuable, creatively speaking, as the meetings. On average, let’s add an hour per meeting for the “extra stuff.” Each meeting requires roughly two hours of work to critique the weekly submissions. That adds up to 310 hours over the year.

That doesn’t account for writing time, of course. I had 23 submissions averaging around 2000 words each. Let’s call that four hours per submission, which we’ll round up to a hundred hours. So, we’re up to 410 hours. This still doesn’t account for blogging, content that’s been written but not yet submitted, content revisions, background research, etc.

When all is said in done, it’s likely that I spent more than 600 hours last year writing, logging, critiquing, networking and otherwise honing my craft. This is what I believe is required in order to ascend to the professional level of writing to which I aspire.

The next challenge, of course, is to actually make money.

Posted in Writing Tips | Tagged , , | Leave a comment